[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DotGNU][PG-Proposal] dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem.
From: |
Matthew Copeland |
Subject: |
[DotGNU][PG-Proposal] dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem. |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:08:38 -0500 |
Project: dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem
Proposed Mailing List name: dotgnu-auth
Description:
The purpose of this project will be to find a replacement for a
single server/entity control over authentication (i.e. passport) that
will allow the following.
* Control of data by the individual. (Privacy Protection)
* Mechanism for automatic logins and single logins.
* Distributed and scalable control mechanism for servers such that
any individual, company, or government can create an
authentication server and the user can decide which to use at run
time. (This means that no single authority can also manage
primary servers like you see with the root nameservers under DNS.)
* Method for replacing .NETs authentication system with the dotGNU
authentication system.
* Method for handling anonnimity within the network.
* Methods for securly handling all data, personal or otherwise.
If I have missed any points, please respond to this message with a
brief description of what is missing.
Matthew M. Copeland
p.s. I am hoping that others will find this kind of format useful.
Please respond to the original message that stated the idea for how this
should be formatted with feedback rather than to this message. That way
feedback to this message can be on just this topic. Thank You.
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its, John, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its and go-mono.net, Matthew Copeland, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its and go-mono.net, Matthew Copeland, 2001/07/09
- [DotGNU]A good warning?, Matthew Copeland, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?, Dave Sherohman, 2001/07/09
- legal issues (was Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/07/22
- Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]A good warning?, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Well its and go-mono.net, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/09
[DotGNU]A plea for some organization., Matthew Copeland, 2001/07/09
- [DotGNU][PG-Proposal] dotGNU authentication and authorization subsystem.,
Matthew Copeland <=
Message not available