Re: [DotGNU]can we implement Java for our auth system?

[Jeremy Petzold]

Adam, 

I can definitely see the potential that this system has. If we choose RLS, it 
would prudent of us to choose the Jabber system as it supports RLS and the 
transition would be that much easier.

the one area that i see a slight problem with is the extreme dependency on the 
server. but I think that you had said something earlier about that.

I think that we should go with RLS, and if we go with RLS we should choose 
Jabber (with slight modifications)


On Tue, 17 July 2001, Adam Theo wrote:

> 
> Jeremy Petzold wrote:
> > 
> > Barry,
> > 
> > I read your Paper on the RLS system, it intrigued me.
> > the system is clear, simple, and straight forward, and such a system would 
> > be simple to add into applications like word processors, and IDEs, ect.
> > the one question that I have is why is there no standard token format? what 
> > advantages does that give to the system that having a standard format does 
> > not?
> > I would think that it would make it more difficult on the server side to 
> > process the RLS with out a standard format. Am I missing something?
> 
> hello, i found the official docs on how Jabber does addressing and
> resource locations.
> 
> i was wondering what you thought of this, if it could be used or
> incorporated into DotGNU's addressing?
> 
> http://docs.jabber.org/general/html/overview.html#JIDS
> 
> i also highly recommend the above document from the beginning. it is an
> excellent technical introduction to Jabber and it's potentials.
> 
> http://docs.jabber.org/general/html/overview.html
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers

Regards,

Jeremy
Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
http://www.shopping.altavista.com