[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU
From: |
Martin Coxall |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:26:24 +0100 |
> Aren't you aware of the Free Software implementations of Java?
> (They're not as powerful as Sun's proprietary implementation,
> but quite usable.)
I am, but simply because you release the code under the GPL does not absolve
you from compliance with Sun's stringent (and proprietary) licensing terms,
and the use of a closed, proprietary language. I feel we have no choice to
avoid Java entirely, or suffer the pollutement of our system architecture
with legal hassle from overactive Sun lawyers who see us threatining their
revenue stream. This will happen if we use Java as a core, it is only a
matter of time/
> > help out Mono instead...
>
> Actually there's a problem in this area. Mono's C# compiler is
> written in C#. So you need another C# compiler to bootstrap it.
> How to do this without using Microsoft's C# compiler?
Well, there is Portable.NET's attempts to write a GCC frontend, of course. C#
is an ideal language in which to write c# compilers, however, because of the
nature of the System.reflection.emit() API. What we need is a GNU/Linux
JITter for Mono (written in C). Ximian has work on that well underway. If we
helped them, we could have it down in a month or two...
---
Martin
---
"Where laughing and smiling are not allowed"
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), (continued)
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Dan Kuykendall (Seek3r), 2001/07/23
- Re: Java issues, and Microsoft.NET compatibility (was Re: [DotGNU]Choice of bytecode spec (was: Support Java for .GNU)), Adam Theo, 2001/07/23
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Kent Nguyen, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Adam Theo, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU,
Martin Coxall <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/19
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/19
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Barry Fitzgerald, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Norbert Bollow, 2001/07/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Jeremy Petzold, 2001/07/18
Re: [DotGNU]Re: Support Java for .GNU, Martin Coxall, 2001/07/18