|
From: | tali streit |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: [Arch]Re: [DotGNU]Fwd: Compatibility is king (E-Mail from RMS) |
Date: | Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:09:48 +1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010622 |
--- Jeremy Petzold <address@hidden> wrote:I don't think that I saw your earlier message about this, however, that is a very good way to go, as you said we would support multiple languages and adding a language would not be much of a problem. it would make integrating DotGNU into a desktop or application fairly easy as well. heh, exposing our own API could make us a serious target for M$, we all know what they do to middleware that threatens their platform.:-)
exposing our protocols makes us a target for M$. (please correct my misunderstandings in any of the following) 1. DotGNU is a set of protocols and services 2. We provide a set of services/daemons (e.g. Authmaster/databank)3. We provide an API that makes use of these services over our protocols. these can be called from any program and are platform specific. this i think of as the OSs layer. current programs and all languages can use these APIs
4. We develop a byte code that provides for making calls via the API. this is the OSi layer. new compilers would output the bytecode.
let me know how far off the mark i am :) -zenic
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |