[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HTTP vs HTTPS (was Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#)
From: |
Barry Fitzgerald |
Subject: |
Re: HTTP vs HTTPS (was Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#) |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 09:49:42 -0400 |
Norbert Bollow wrote:
>
> I think that HTTP is better than HTTPS for DotGNU because we
> will often transfer large amounts of data that don't need
> excryption (such as Portable Executables of publicly-released
> software).
>
> So I think it is best to build on an entirely untrusted
> communication channel (implemented with HTTP or an extension
> of HTTP) and decide for every item of data whether it needs
> encryption or a digital signature or both.
>
> Greetings, Norbert.
>
Sounds good to me :)
encapsulating a privately encrypted packet would be more flexible in any
circumstance - it could give the user control over how they want their
data encrypted.
-Barry
- Re: [DotGNU]Ignoring C#, (continued)