[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Sep 2002 18:10:44 -0300 |
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 07:11:37 +0200 (IST)
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> I was talking about usability and back-compatibility.
Back-compatibility for sure (no gamer I know would touch NT/2K/XP with a
ten feet pole, for example). But usability is highly subjective, of
course; I find XP the most usable and likable of all Windows I've tried.
> I think the real problem [...] the need to support COMMAND.COM, CMD.EXE,
> and the Cygwin/MinGW environment at the same time and with the same
> Makefile's.
Yes.
--
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/04
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05