[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:20:54 +0200 (IST) |
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:59:58 +0300, "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Ah, sorry, I wasn't aware of that (you didn't show the file created
> > by the command, so I was confused).
>
> Uh? In my example, the "for" redirects to test.txt, and the bat file
> then "types" the contents of test.txt surrounded by rows of "=" to
> differentiate any other posible output from the contents of test.txt.
Yes, but when everything is shown together, and the output describes a
bug, it's hard to be sure that the "===" delimiters are indeed
trustworthy.
> > Does it help to put the redirection at the beginning of the command,
> > like below?
>
> I'll try it at home ASAP. Thanks.
Thank you.
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/01
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/04
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/05
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/06
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/18
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/09/20
- Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/09/20