[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non
From: |
Andrew Choi |
Subject: |
Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library] |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Nov 2003 18:21:44 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I looked at the patch, and it seems to be too big (it adds 60+ new
> source lines) to install without legal papers, and I cannot see that
> Nozumu Ando has signed papers.
>
> I think you should check with RMS if we need papers for this.
>
> Kim
We did already. RMS handled this himself.
- Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/01
- Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library],
Andrew Choi <=
- Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Richard Stallman, 2003/11/02
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/02
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, David Kastrup, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Dave Carlton, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Joseph C. Slater, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/06