[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we need legal papers
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Do we need legal papers |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:32:28 -0500 |
I appreciate the work you have done so far. If the explanations that
others have posted convince you to continue, would you please tell me?
Otherwise, I guess we have no one maintaining Emacs on the Mac for the
moment. If someone else is interested in picking up the
maintainership, please let me know.
I am pretty sure I asked you at some point if you would please work on
further MacOS issues. When someone recorded your name in MAINTAINERS,
it was probably a reflection of the fact he saw you doing the job.
- Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/01
- Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Andrew Choi, 2003/11/01
- Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Richard Stallman, 2003/11/02
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/02
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, David Kastrup, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Dave Carlton, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Joseph C. Slater, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/06
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Sébastien Kirche, 2003/11/07
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/09
Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library], Richard Stallman, 2003/11/02