[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library] |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:18:04 -0500 |
I looked at the patch, and it seems to be too big (it adds 60+ new
source lines) to install without legal papers, and I cannot see that
Nozumu Ando has signed papers.
I think you should check with RMS if we need papers for this.
If it is 60 lines long, we definitely need legal papers for it.
Andrew, you had better delete it now, while we wait to get papers for
it. Would you please ack when it is deleted?
When we get Nozomu's papers, I will inform people.
- Re: Do we need legal papers, (continued)
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, David Kastrup, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/04
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Dave Carlton, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Joseph C. Slater, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/05
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Andrew Choi, 2003/11/06
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Sébastien Kirche, 2003/11/07
- Re: Do we need legal papers, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/09
Re: Do we need legal papers [was: patch for unexmacosx.c: supporting non-prebound dynamic library],
Richard Stallman <=