[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BIG5-HKSCS?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: BIG5-HKSCS? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 02:01:29 -0500 |
I meant that it wasn't run by some mailing list software that set the
sender address to the mailing list software, instead of maintaining
the original sender address (i.e., my address).
That way of running a list is a pain in the neck, because it makes
sending a reply just to the sender of a message rather inconvenient.
So we do not generally set up our lists that way.
- Re: eight-bit char handling in emacs-unicode, (continued)
- Re: eight-bit char handling in emacs-unicode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/26
- Re: eight-bit char handling in emacs-unicode, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/27
- Re: eight-bit char handling in emacs-unicode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/27
- Re: eight-bit char handling in emacs-unicode, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/29
- Re: eight-bit char handling in emacs-unicode, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/30
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/15
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Kenichi Handa, 2003/11/16
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/16
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/11/17
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/17
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/18
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/19
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/20
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/11/20
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/20