[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BIG5-HKSCS?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: BIG5-HKSCS? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:15:46 -0500 |
I think there is some confusion here; the sender address is not the
same as adding a Reply-To header, which I believe you refer to. I
agree using a mailing list software that add a Reply-To header that
point to the mailing list itself is just wrong. But altering the
sender address to the mailing list software itself avoids a torrent of
bounces to everyone that sends a message to the list.
You are right, I did misunderstand that point. Sorry.
I think it would be best to make address@hidden a proper
mail.gnu.org mailing list.
It is a proper mailing list now, just not managed through mailman.
I have no opinion on whether to use mailman to manage that list,
but I strongly object to the idea that there is something less
valid or less proper about defining a mailing list as an alias.
- Re: eight-bit char handling in emacs-unicode, (continued)
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/15
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Kenichi Handa, 2003/11/16
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/16
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/11/17
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/17
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Richard Stallman, 2003/11/18
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/18
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/20
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/11/20
- Re: BIG5-HKSCS?, Simon Josefsson, 2003/11/20