[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:32:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 01:28:56AM +0100, Kim F. Storm wrote:
> So the intention is to continue using MSB tags by default, and
> only use LSB on those systems which really need it (eg. FreeBSD) ?
I'd prefer to just entirely switch to LSB tags too, but I interpreted
Stefan's message as simple caution -- let's get some experience first before
committing to anything, and in the process be able to support some more
systems.
Personally I'll turn them on unconditionally when I compile my own emacs.
I think for testing, it would be good if it's simple to do this (e.g., with a
configure option).
-Miles
--
80% of success is just showing up. --Woody Allen
- tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/19
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/19
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/20
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, David Kastrup, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/21