[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits |
|
Date: |
20 Nov 2003 18:31:32 +0900 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Once LSB is in place, I would like us to get rid of XFASTINT
> all-together. It's a potential danger lurking to hit us.
Um, in the LSB code, XFASTINT is the same as XINT...
-Miles
--
"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
you do it." Mahatma Gandhi
- tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/19
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/19
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/20
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, David Kastrup, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Kim F. Storm, 2003/11/21
- Re: tags in the 3 lowest bits, Stefan Monnier, 2003/11/23