[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan...
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan... |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:57:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:10:35 +0100, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > I think an explicit decision should be made one way or the other.
>>
>> Based on the fact that _I_ don't have the necessary time to debug more
>> silly xasserts, _I_ made the explicit decision to disable them.
>
> So you're gonna go the "childish commit wars" route?
Childish or not, I don't have time for
a) discussing this issue further
b) debugging more of those "silly asserts".
> You're a good hacker in many ways Kim, but this is just stupid.
I agree.
> The
> Emacs hacker community is generally above that sort of thing (unlike
> many other projects); please let's keep it that way.
Sure.
In any case, the change I made allows you to easily turn on
asserts, e.g.:
/configure CFLAGS="-g -O0 -DXASSERTS=1"
If somebody would refine that to
/configure --with-asserts
it would be great!!
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., (continued)
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/01
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., David Kastrup, 2005/03/01
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Miles Bader, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., David Kastrup, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Miles Bader, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., David Kastrup, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Miles Bader, 2005/03/02
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan...,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Jan D., 2005/03/04
- Re: Ok, here is the bug I have been looking for. Kim, not Jan..., Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/06