[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2 |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 09:27:30 -0800 |
> it might be generally useful to have a command that picks up the
> line-number from the text at point (whenever that text can be
> parsed as a numeral) and does `goto-line' in buffer
> `(other-buffer (current-buffer) t)'.
We already have that, it's compilation-minor-mode.
Looking at the code for compilation-minor-mode (as I'm inexperienced with
it), I see no connection with what I suggested. That mode appears to work
only in buffers that can be parsed to work with next-error etc.
What I suggested was a simple command to pick up a numeral from any buffer,
regardless of what the numeral might mean in that buffer. It would be
rudimentary, but would do at least what people are doing with `goto-line',
without requiring them to key in the line number. A minor suggestion -
that's all.
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=no version=3.0.2, (continued)
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=no version=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Jari Aalto+mail.linux, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=no version=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=no version=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Jari Aalto, 2005/03/02
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Drew Adams, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Andreas Schwab, 2005/03/03
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Kevin Rodgers, 2005/03/03
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Drew Adams, 2005/03/03
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/04
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Miles Bader, 2005/03/04
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Drew Adams, 2005/03/04
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Miles Bader, 2005/03/04
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Drew Adams, 2005/03/04
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Miles Bader, 2005/03/04
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/04
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Reiner Steib, 2005/03/05