[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:00:51 -0800 |
> FYI - I don't suggest that `goto-line' itself should be
> changed this way, but the code I sent for `goto-line-at-point'
I think goto-line should do it.
What is "it"? You cut off the rest of my sentence where I said what I meant
by "changed this way": use `number-nearest-point'. I suspect that your "it"
is not my "this way", but I'm not sure what you mean.
RMS has already said that he is not interested in such nearest-point stuff
in Emacs. That's why I changed it to `number-at-point' in the code I sent,
and that's why I said that I don't propose it for `goto-line' itelf. I
mentioned it only "FYI", for the original poster, in particular.
Your suggestion to pick up the line number at bol might be acceptable to
RMS, however. I think that the main pb he had with the "nearest" stuff was
that its scope was not sufficiently constrained. That is not a pb with bol.
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=no version=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, (continued)
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=no version=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Jari Aalto, 2005/03/02
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Drew Adams, 2005/03/02
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Andreas Schwab, 2005/03/03
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Drew Adams, 2005/03/03
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Kevin Rodgers, 2005/03/03
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Drew Adams, 2005/03/03
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/04
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Miles Bader, 2005/03/04
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Drew Adams, 2005/03/04
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Miles Bader, 2005/03/04
- RE: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Miles Bader, 2005/03/04
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/04
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Reiner Steib, 2005/03/05
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/05
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-lineautolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Miles Bader, 2005/03/05
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Johan Bockgård, 2005/03/05
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2005/03/05
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2005/03/06
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/06
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line autolearn=noversion=3.0.2 autolearn=no version=3.0.2, Miles Bader, 2005/03/06