[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?)
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?) |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:57:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> I just patched up preview-latex to place the invisible property on the
> overlays it creates (obviously, not the desired default behavior).
> Now this is using overlays, not text properties, but the results
> should be pretty much the same.
>
> And the results are that stuff is not found indeed when using isearch.
> query-replace-regexp, however, still finds it. Non-interactive search
> doesn't find it.
I think that's ok.
Would someone write some advise to put into the lispref section on
the display property.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), (continued)
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/25
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/24
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Juri Linkov, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/25
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/22
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), David Kastrup, 2005/03/22
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), David Kastrup, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?),
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), David Kastrup, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/25
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Juri Linkov, 2005/03/23
RE: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Drew Adams, 2005/03/21