[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
David Reitter |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:39:54 -0500 |
On Feb 25, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Would the equivalent of "git reset olderrevid ; git push -f" inconvenience
>> people very much?
>
> Don't even _think_ about that!
I hear you.
The consequences get worse in proportion to the time span between the faulty
commit and the history manipulation.
What happens if somebody checked in code for which permission hasn't been
obtained and can't be obtained? Suppose the copyright-holder requests removal.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: emacs-w3m?, (continued)
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Richard Stallman, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
David Reitter <=
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Roehler, 2010/02/25