[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:10:46 +0900 |
David Reitter writes:
> What happens if somebody checked in code for which permission
> hasn't been obtained and can't be obtained? Suppose the
> copyright-holder requests removal.
Then you think (and do) the unthinkable, of course. It would be very
good luck if that's all they want, though -- that scenario involves
much bigger problems.
- Re: emacs-w3m?, (continued)
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Richard Stallman, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, David Reitter, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Roehler, 2010/02/25