[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:35:51 +0200 |
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 19:56, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Oops, sorry, I misunderstood.
> Yes, indeed, it will be run last. And it will also be run first if the
> mode is written "properly" (by inheriting from some other mode).
> We should maybe split this into two parts: fundamental-mode-hook and
> after-change-major-mode-hook, the first is the one run before any other
> mode hook and the second is run after all other mode hooks.
Has this been fixed by r100061?
Because, for example,
(add-hook 'completion-list-mode-hook (lambda () (linum-mode -1)))
(global-linum-mode 1)
still activates linum-mode in completion buffers.
Juanma
- globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, David Reitter, 2010/04/25
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, David Reitter, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Glenn Morris, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, David Reitter, 2010/04/28