[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?
From: |
David Reitter |
Subject: |
Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 19:02:59 -0400 |
On Apr 28, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> As an aside, it would be good to have a simple way to say "I don't
>> want global mode X applied to buffers Y, Z and W."
>
> Yes, that would be a welcome addition.
I agree.
Please consider hand-crafting global minor modes in some cases.
Take `visual-line-mode': What it does is to configure a number of variables,
most of which are buffer-local:
(line-move-visual truncate-lines truncate-partial-width-windows word-wrap
fringe-indicator-alist)
The classic way to configure a default for these would be `set-default'. This
seems cleaner and more efficient than automatically deriving a globalized
version of the mode that runs (at least) at every major mode change and may
then be turned off again by the mode hook.
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, (continued)
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, David Reitter, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Glenn Morris, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/04/27
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?,
David Reitter <=