[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs as word processor
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs as word processor |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:06:35 -0500 |
[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider
[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,
[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.
First of all, I claim that WYSIWYG has issues of its own. Please do
read [1]. I admit, that this text is very old but the key points are
still valid. Most people I know who know WYSIWYG *and* their
alternatives are not always very happy with using WYSIWYG. So why
follow this path which is know to be faulty?
It's not faulty. It's imperfect.
The other points are just jobs to be done.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- Re: Emacs will never be a WYSIWYG-editor and should not try to, (continued)
- Re: Emacs will never be a WYSIWYG-editor and should not try to, Richard Stallman, 2013/11/26
- Re: Emacs will never be a WYSIWYG-editor and should not try to, Andreas Röhler, 2013/11/26
- Re: Emacs will never be a WYSIWYG-editor and should not try to, Achim Gratz, 2013/11/26
- Re: Emacs will never be a WYSIWYG-editor and should not try to, Andreas Röhler, 2013/11/27
- Re: Emacs will never be a WYSIWYG-editor and should not try to, Richard Stallman, 2013/11/26
- Re: Emacs will never be a WYSIWYG-editor and should not try to, Achim Gratz, 2013/11/26
- Re: Emacs will never be a WYSIWYG-editor and should not try to (was: Emacs as word processor), Richard Stallman, 2013/11/24
Re: Emacs as word processor,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Emacs as word processor, Anas R., 2013/11/23