Re: Emacs will never be a WYSIWYG-editor and should not try to

[Bastien]

Andreas Röhler <address@hidden> writes:

>> For the second item, you can't have it without Org.
>
> Why not? We are speaking about org-babel, which is a great idea but not 
> related to
> the ToDo, time- and date stuff, were org-mode started and what its name 
> indicates.

Because it's technically impossible.

>> For the third one, there is already
>>
>>    M-x orgtbl-mode RET
>>    M-x orgstruct-mode RET
>
> Well, so my suggestion is to transform it into just table-mode,
> struct-mode etc.

The name of the minor-modes reminds people those modes use Org syntax,
other names would be too generic IMHO.

>> Do you have a concrete suggestion for another minor-mode
>> that could spin off from Org?
>
> footnote? There will be a lot more with some probability...

Org footnotes can be used through orgstruct-mode, I think that's
enough.

I grok your general idea, but I'm afraid it's too general for me
now.

-- 
 Bastien