[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New maintainer
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: New maintainer |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Oct 2015 09:40:43 +0300 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 23:49:16 +0200
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, John Wiegley <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > What bothers me are the socialistic aspects involved, the _way_ RMS
> > demonizes
> > other approaches to licensing (eerily similar to how socialism demonizes
> other
> > political philosophies),
>
> Perhaps we should leave non-software-related politics out of this discussion.
I agree.
Please also keep in mind that AFAIK a possibility exists to more or
less split these two parts, by nominating a "steering committee" for
the project, which will act as the FSF representative and deal with
most of these issues. Several projects (GCC and GDB, to give just 2
examples) already have that, although the split is not very strong
there (because there's no need, IIUC).
Richard, please correct me if I'm wrong in my understanding.
- Re: New maintainer, (continued)
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Juanma Barranquero, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: New maintainer, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Lennart Borgman, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, David Kastrup, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: New maintainer, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/08