[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib? |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Oct 2015 09:48:08 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 18:24:30 -0700
>
> > Did you miss my further message where I said we should probably
> > preload cl-lib, because many popular commands in a fresh session load
> > it anyway?
>
> I did, sorry. Anyway, let's wait until we have a new maintainer and
> release Emacs 25 before making this change, but it sounds like we
> definitely want to proceed in the direction of dumping cl-lib.
I see no reason to wait until Emacs 25.1 is released. The release
date is sufficiently far away for us to be able to do that ASAP.
> Trying to do it locally, I ran into a very weird problem: functions we
> call at compile time, like cl--defalias, raise errors when called: the
> bytecode vector ends up being the number zero instead of the expected
> string. Turning cl--defalias and similar functions into macros makes the
> build work, but it doesn't solve the real problem.
If you have time, please try fixing this.
Thanks.
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, (continued)
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?,
Eli Zaretskii <=