[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts? |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Oct 2015 12:57:19 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 11:40:17 +0200 (CEST)
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>
>
> > Perhaps a good first step would be for someone to produce pictures
> > of the rendered texts from those tests (using Harfbuzz or anything
> > else that can be used as reference), and then we could compare that
> > with what Emacs produces for the same texts, and see how good or bad
> > we are doing.
>
> This is *exactly* what should be avoided IMHO. It's both far too much
> work and too imprecise.
Not if it's the only practical alternative (besides doing nothing).
- how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08