[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts? |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 11:18:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> I meant ZWJ and ZWNJ the characters, U+200C and U+200D. Or did I
> misunderstand you?
Ah, it was I who misunderstood, Eli. I don't use these characters when typing
in Emacs, only when preparing texts in layout applications.
The ZWNJ seems to work fine, but the ZWJ does not produce the behavior
documented here:
http://persian.nmelrc.org/persianword/zwj.htm
That is, ZWJ does not extend the heh into a "heh do chesm" (heh with two
eyes), it just adds space before or after the final-form (circular) heh.
John
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, (continued)
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, John Wiegley, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: how reliable is rendering of complex scripts?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08