[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib? |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Oct 2015 09:07:20 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> Please always accompany such suggestions with rationale. Adding to the core
> just because "why not?" is IMO not a good methodology. Some people still
> care about the memory footprint of programs, so we don't want to bloat that
> unless there are good reasons. Such reasons can only be discussed on a case
> by case basis.
Although personally I wouldn't mind seeing cl-lib in core, for the benefit of
Emacs I have to agree with Eli. It's not something we should do just because
it sounds like a good idea, but because not doing it would cost us something.
Shaving a few milliseconds from startup is not enough of a gain to be worth
bloating core.
John
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, (continued)
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Mark Oteiza, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Tassilo Horn, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Nicolas Petton, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Mark Oteiza, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Mark Oteiza, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Daniel Colascione, 2015/10/08
- Re: Should we just start dumping cl-lib?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/08