[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:35:24 +0200 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:39:17 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> >> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:14:41 +0100
> >>
> >> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > If they do, they will not be able to distinguish between the
> >> > definition and the references. All the values are equal.
> >>
> >> A TAGS file does not know anything. It is just an index, whose
> >> interpretation is up to the application.
> >
> > The application just interprets what's in the file. If the file
> > doesn't provide any indication that one of the entries is a
> > definition, the application will not know which one is.
>
> There are producers and consumers. They just have to agree on the
> format.
I was talking about the _existing_ format. It goes without saying
that it can be (almost trivially) extended to support additional
functionality. But then it won't be TAGS format, strictly speaking.
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Nikolaus Rath, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE, Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: IDE, Marcus Harnisch, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Oleh Krehel, 2015/10/27
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/27