[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Nov 2016 10:16:55 +0200 |
[Moving this to emacs-devel.]
> From: address@hidden (Phillip Lord)
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 10:19:30 +0000
>
> > The name of the file is not important, since it's supposed to be
> > renamed when it's put into the distribution. So I'd rather not change
> > the name, because doing so makes investigating repository history
> > harder.
>
> Okay, I'll restore that, and commit to emacs-25.
I made some minor changes in the file. Please make sure to leave 2
spaces between sentences, per our conventions (your commit log
messages have the same problem, btw). Also, please don't remove
information about Windows 9X, as the 32-bit MS-Windows build of Emacs
still supports that.
Thanks.
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06