[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:24:53 +0200 |
> From: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 18:01:47 +0100
>
> >> Windows 9X is a virus magnet and reservoir.
> >
> > Which has nothing to do with Emacs, even if it's true.
>
> As long as Emacs officially supports Windows 9x, it is implicitly
> endorsing it. Because the basis of the GNU project is political and
> moral, it is important that we send the correct messages to our users.
I think you missed something I said here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-11/msg00155.html
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/05
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Phillip Lord, 2016/11/07
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/08
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/06
- Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/07