[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
From: |
Perry E. Metzger |
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Nov 2016 22:06:13 -0500 |
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:54:16 -0500 Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
wrote:
> > But if new code was written, it would be accepted then.
>
> Would you please remind me what lldb does?
>
It is a free debugger. The controversy was that you felt it competed
with gdb. However, gud has support for proprietary debuggers, so it
seems unfortunate not to be supporting a free one, if a non-GNU one.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger address@hidden
- Re: lldb support, (continued)
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/08
- Re: lldb support,
Perry E. Metzger <=
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, John Mastro, 2016/11/09