[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:43:26 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 20:57:24 -0500
> From: "Perry E. Metzger" <address@hidden>
> Cc: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> gud mode supports completely unfree debuggers. lldb is free software.
> It seems like bad policy to encourage the use of non-free tools by
> supporting them better than free tools.
Daniel said lldb supports the MI protocol. If that is true, lldb is
already supported. Can someone try that and see if that works, and if
not, tell why?
Thanks.
- Re: lldb support, (continued)
- Re: lldb support, Sam Steingold, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Toon Claes, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/08
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/08