[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rant on ...
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Rant on ... |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:54:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:
> Are there really hackers who prefer to see only some of the relevant
> debugging information?
I prefer the truncated lines in the debugging buffer. It allows me to
scan the stack trace faster. I can expand the lines I'm interested in
after finding them.
> If anybody knows offhand what settings I need to make, please tell me.
I think there's something binding print-length somewhere annoying, but I
forget the details. Or was it eval-expression-print-length?
> Would anybody object to my getting rid of this obfuscation in Emacs, and
> setting the appropriate defaults (whatever they are) not arbitrarily to
> truncate backtraces and other info users have requested?
Data forms can be arbitrarily long. Not truncating them when printing
them can result in printing an expression taking a long time. (I've
experience something like half-minute pauses when dealing with extreme
data structures.)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Rant on ..., Alan Mackenzie, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ...,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Rant on ..., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/11/17
- RE: Rant on ..., Drew Adams, 2016/11/17
- RE: Rant on ..., Drew Adams, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Michael Heerdegen, 2016/11/17
- RE: Rant on ..., Drew Adams, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Noam Postavsky, 2016/11/17
- RE: Rant on ..., Drew Adams, 2016/11/17