[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rant on ...
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: Rant on ... |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:17:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, that would be very nice. And a command to expand the `...' under
> point. If we had those commands, I think we'd cover most of the
> complaints and confusion tied to the *print-le* variables.
FWIW, I chose this different solution for my init file: when I hit a
certain key at any line in the debugger buffer, I get a popup window
that shows the according (clicked) frame as pretty printed lisp
expression in emacs-lisp-mode. Having a separate buffer has its
advantages, since this expression can be really huge. The tricky part
is to get the correct frame number to pass to `backtrace-frame'.
Another command pops up a buffer containing the whole backtrace as a
list of lisp expressions. I chose to bind print-circle -> t for this,
because the frames can share large structures. With print-circle ->
nil, the individual frame are better readable, but the whole thing gets
even huger.
Michael.
- Rant on ..., Alan Mackenzie, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/11/17
- RE: Rant on ..., Drew Adams, 2016/11/17
- RE: Rant on ..., Drew Adams, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ...,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- RE: Rant on ..., Drew Adams, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Noam Postavsky, 2016/11/17
- RE: Rant on ..., Drew Adams, 2016/11/17
- Re: Rant on ..., Michael Heerdegen, 2016/11/18
- Re: Rant on ..., Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/11/17