[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:26:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Nov 28 2016, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> For strings, the argument might not be as strong. Maybe code like
> (ignore (propertize "foo" 'a 'b)) could lead to us working on an
> unreachable string, so it could get GC'd while we manipulate its
> intervals.
The arguments to propertize will still be reachable from the bytecode
stack.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, (continued)
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/28
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/26
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Ken Raeburn, 2016/11/27
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/27
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Ken Raeburn, 2016/11/28
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28