[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:34:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> For strings, the argument might not be as strong. Maybe code like
>> (ignore (propertize "foo" 'a 'b)) could lead to us working on an
>> unreachable string, so it could get GC'd while we manipulate its
>> intervals.
> The arguments to propertize will still be reachable from the bytecode
> stack.
I was giving this code as an example of the kind of operations and the
order in which they're performed.
Stefan
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, (continued)
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Andreas Schwab, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe,
Stefan Monnier <=
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/26
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Ken Raeburn, 2016/11/27
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/27
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Ken Raeburn, 2016/11/28
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/27