[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RFC: String interpolation
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: RFC: String interpolation |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:48:54 -0800 (PST) |
> I see. Personally, I don't think we need to extend format at all.
> How many others really want this extension?
Not I. Not in the ways discussed so far, at least. Current
`format' is better (for me).
(On the other hand, if someone were to work toward a `cl-format',
even one that was partial and could be extended later, I'd likely
welcome that.)
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, (continued)
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, John Wiegley, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, John Wiegley, 2016/12/13
- RE: RFC: String interpolation,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/13
- RE: RFC: String interpolation, Drew Adams, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Brinkhoff, 2016/12/14
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Brinkhoff, 2016/12/14
- RE: RFC: String interpolation, Drew Adams, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/14
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/14
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/12