[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RFC: String interpolation
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: RFC: String interpolation |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:24:32 -0800 (PST) |
> What if we did something a little more implicit:
>
> For a format string, the number of occurrences % in that string determines
> how many arguments it "consumes". Once that many arguments have been
> consumed, the process restarts.
See also http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/a-few-format-recipes.html.
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, (continued)
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, John Wiegley, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Paul Eggert, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, John Wiegley, 2016/12/13
- RE: RFC: String interpolation, Drew Adams, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/13
- RE: RFC: String interpolation, Drew Adams, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Brinkhoff, 2016/12/14
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Brinkhoff, 2016/12/14
- RE: RFC: String interpolation,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/14
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/14
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/14
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Helmut Eller, 2016/12/12