[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: String interpolation
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: String interpolation |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:01:17 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Perhaps I misunderstood that proposal. Would %{thing} by itself be
> > valid?
> No.
That means I made a mistake. It's not ambiguous, but it is rather
ugly to put the format spec after the interpolated value.
The syntax with square-brackets before the interpolated value is
cleaner.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, (continued)
- RE: RFC: String interpolation, Drew Adams, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/14
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/14
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Richard Stallman, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/12/13
- Re: RFC: String interpolation,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/12/12
- Re: RFC: String interpolation, Helmut Eller, 2016/12/12