[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Dec 2016 08:40:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
Hello, Stefan.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 08:33:56PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > First forward run Backwards Second forward run
> > master: 34.100s 36.050s 34.575s
> > comment-cache: 30.110s 32.275s 34.990s
> How come comment-cache is slower on the second run than on the first?
I don't know. I've spent quite some time searching for an answer
without coming up with any theories. But it's definitely something
systematic, it's not just random noise in an isolated timing.
The good news is that on third and subsequent runs, it doesn't get any
slower.
> Stefan
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/23
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/23
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/23
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Elias MÃ¥rtenson, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24