[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:41:39 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Building the interval tree that stores text properties from scratch is
> faster than modifying it.
Then would it be better to discard that data after each operation?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/23
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/23
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/23
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Andreas Röhler, 2016/12/24
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/12/24
- Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch, Alan Mackenzie, 2016/12/27