[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'? |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:12:54 +0200 |
> From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:34:30 +0100
>
> Ok, here is a first draft of how I could imagine an addition to the
> manual (as plain txt):
Thanks.
> -- Function: thunk-force THUNK
>
> Force a thunk to perform the evaluation of the FORMS specified to the
> `thunk-delay' that created the thunk.
This should have FORMS in lower-case and THUNK in upper-case
> -- Macro: lazy-let (bindings...) forms...
>
> This macro is analogue to `let' but creates "lazy" variable bindings.
^^^^^^^^
"analogous"
> Any binding has the form (SYMBOL VALUE-FORM). Unlike `let', the
> evaluation of any VALUE-FORM is deferred until the binding of the
> according SYMBOL is used for the first time when evaluating the FORMS.
> Any VALUE-FORM is evaluated maximally once.
^^^^^^^^^
"at most"
> WDYT?
It's good, thank you.
Let me know if you need specific help with Texinfo-izing this.
- Re: `thunk-let'?, (continued)
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/11
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/11
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Nicolas Petton, 2017/11/10
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09