[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `thunk-let'?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: `thunk-let'? |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:48:05 +0200 |
> From: Clément Pit-Claudel <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 16:48:01 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > Well, it's in subr-x because I'm not sure that it is yet a good idea to
> > "advertize it so loudly" as Stefan uses to say.
>
> That sounded a lot like the reason we usually invoke to put stuff into MELPA.
Not for features used by Emacs internally.
- RE: `thunk-let'?, (continued)
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/08
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- RE: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Re: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/11
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/11
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Nicolas Petton, 2017/11/10
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09