Re: `thunk-let'?

[Gemini Lasswell]

Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden> writes:

> +  (should-error (byte-compile (thunk-let ((x 1 1)) x)))
> +  (should-error (byte-compile (thunk-let (27) x)))
> +  (should-error (byte-compile (thunk-let x x))))

Since the thunk-let forms aren't quoted, should-error is catching the
evaluation error of the thunk-let form before byte-compile is called.
And to my knowledge byte-compile doesn't signal errors, just issues
warnings.

It's also better to have the erroneous forms be quoted so that they
don't cause errors when using Edebug or Testcover on thunk-tests.el.