[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `thunk-let'?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: `thunk-let'? |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:20:07 +0200 |
> From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 23:22:09 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Given that "lazy evaluation" seems not to be described anywhere in the
> > ELisp manual, I think we cannot get away with "---" here, and will
> > have to add at least something to the manual.
>
> Well, it's in subr-x because I'm not sure that it is yet a good idea to
> "advertize it so loudly" as Stefan uses to say. Nothing in subr-x is
> described in the manual.
I'm not sure this should be in subr-x.el. That file is AFAIU for
stuff used _internally_ in Emacs, which this macro isn't.
Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/08
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/08
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/08
- Re: `thunk-let'?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- RE: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Re: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
Re: `thunk-let'?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09