[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
git log question
From: |
Stephen Berman |
Subject: |
git log question |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:00:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
I thought if I call `git log <commit> -1' on the current branch, it will
only show <commit> if it is in the current branch, but I just discovered
this is not so: I called it with master current and <commit> being one I
knew was only in emacs-26, but nevertheless it showed that commit. The
same thing with `git log --branches=master <commit> -1' and `git log
--branches="master" <commit> -1' (I couldn't tell from the doc if the
branch name should be quoted, but it made no difference). What's the
required incantation? Thanks.
Steve Berman
- git log question,
Stephen Berman <=
- Re: git log question, Mathias Megyei, 2017/11/30
- Re: git log question, Stephen Berman, 2017/11/30
- Re: git log question, Yuri Khan, 2017/11/30
- Re: git log question, Stephen Berman, 2017/11/30
- Re: git log question, Noam Postavsky, 2017/11/30
- Re: git log question, Yuri Khan, 2017/11/30
- Re: git log question, Andreas Schwab, 2017/11/30
- Re: git log question, Kaushal Modi, 2017/11/30
- Re: git log question, Andreas Schwab, 2017/11/30
- Re: git log question, Noam Postavsky, 2017/11/30