|
From: | Mathias Megyei |
Subject: | Re: git log question |
Date: | Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:30:07 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
On 11/30/2017 11:00 AM, Stephen Berman wrote:
I thought if I call `git log <commit> -1' on the current branch, it will only show <commit> if it is in the current branch,
When you want to know whether <commit> (originally committed to emacs-26) has been merged into master or any other local branch then you can use
git branch --contains <commit> In order to list remote tracking branches please add option '-r' git branch -r --contains <commit> Mathias
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |