[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2019 22:22:37 -0400 |
On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 22:06, Paul W. Rankin <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, May 21 2019, Richard Stallman wrote:
>> Backquote is a well-known construct, a de-facto standard since over
>> 40 years ago.
> backquote may well be a 40-year-old standard,
The standard is about the read syntax; at least, Common Lisp
explicitly says it is implementation dependent what the result of
(read "`(foo ,bar)") is.
For Emacs, that currently gives (\` (foo (\, bar))), I think it would
be nicer if it gave (quasiquote (foo (unqote bar)). From what I can
tell this has been standard in Scheme since r3rs (1986).
- Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Paul W. Rankin, 2019/05/19
- Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Richard Stallman, 2019/05/20
- Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Richard Stallman, 2019/05/21
- Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Paul W. Rankin, 2019/05/21
- Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/22
- Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Paul W. Rankin, 2019/05/22
- Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Michael Heerdegen, 2019/05/22
- Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, 조성빈, 2019/05/22
- Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Michael Heerdegen, 2019/05/22
- Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Richard Stallman, 2019/05/22
Re: Improving aesthetics & readability of backquote, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/20